On 16.05.2013 11:18 Karl Koch wrote:
..."Both Blocking modes above require and consider (!) C/(N+I). Therefore its value should be set correctly.
The third Blocking mode User defined supposes positive values in terms of "blocking response", i.e. the required C/(N+I) is already taken into account by the limits".
Dear Karl,
Thank you for your response. In fact, I am working with SEAMCAT v4.0.0 and using the files of the CEPT Report 104 because our studies are simmilar. However, in this report the SEAMCAT version used is version 3 and I do not know if the calculation of blocking attenuation is the same in both versions.
What I do not understand at all is why in this report (Annex 2) C=I=NoiseFloor and therefore C/I=0, C/(N+I)= -3 dB ... and the relationship with the figure you attached in your previous post.
Thank you in advance.
Best.